Asia ex Japan: There Could Be a Turnaround on the Horizon

Matthews Asia Portfolio Manager Yu Zhang explains why he made few changes to the portfolio in the first quarter of the year.

After a turbulent year for Asian equities in 2018, which saw the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index fall 14.12%, the first quarter of 2019 has been much more rewarding for investors as the backdrop for Asian equities improved thanks to easing fears concerning trade tensions, a pause in the U.S. rate hikes and new monetary and fiscal policy measures coming out of China.

Year to date, the MSCI AC Asia ex Japan Index is up 11.45%, while over the same time period the Matthews Asia ex Japan Dividend Fund returned 10.86%.1 However, despite macro improvements and a strong rebound in Fund performance, we made few changes to the portfolio in the first quarter of the year.

Asia is beginning to enter a late stage earnings cycles, with consensus expecting either flat or slightly negative earnings per share growth (EPS) for equities in 2019. This uncertainty regarding earnings sustainability, combined with the need for fundamentals in the region to improve further, means we are reluctant at this stage to position the portfolio more aggressively.

Our approach to dividend investing balances stable, high dividend-yielding stocks with slightly more cyclical, but higher dividend growth stocks. This flexible approach not only allows us to capture attractive opportunities, but has also helped to navigate market volatility, such as we saw in 2018.

Over three years to 31 March 2019, the Fund displayed lower volatility than the benchmark, with standard deviation of just 11.95% versus 13.09% for the MSCI Asia ex Japan Index. However over the same time period the Fund has outperformed, with an annual return of 14.57% versus 12.21% for the index.

Since we launched the Fund in November 2015, the balance between stable dividend payers and fast-growing dividend payers has shifted depending on market conditions. Last year the portfolio was repositioned to have a roughly even split between the two, a stance we maintained throughout the first quarter. Our view is that if we reach a trade war resolution, which is by no means certain, more than half of this has already been priced into valuations. As a result we need to be slightly more cautious on what today represents an attractive opportunity.

We could adjust our positioning slightly as different sectors and different companies provide alternative earnings profiles at the early stage of the earnings cycle versus the latter stages, but if people are already pricing in an earnings recovery our stance will be less aggressive.

Spikes of volatility do not change my view that relatively speaking conditions in Asia are beginning to recover and improve. We will likely use these shots of volatility to increase our exposure to dividend growth names that were previously quite expensive. If volatility brings down the valuation of these good structural names, I will happily deploy additional capital.

Two of the stocks added to the portfolio in the first quarter fit into this category. One sits in the consumer business sector, the other is a consumer discretionary. In both cases it was volatility that brought down their valuations.

While year-to-date the portfolio has not changed hugely, we did increase our exposure to Chinese A-shares. We think China's recovery looks more sustainable compared with 2015, when it underwent a quick boom and bust cycle owing to leveraged liquidity going into the stock market. This time the recovery is mainly the result of the market opening up to foreign investors and the MSCI's increased weighting to Chinese A-shares, while leveraged liquidity is being better controlled by regulation. As a result some of the A-Shares are beginning to look more reasonably priced after last year's correction.

Geographically, while we do consider macro factors when making long-term investment decisions, the Fund is very much a bottom-up driven strategy. The portfolio's large overweight in some of Asia's frontier markets, such as Vietnam and Bangladesh, is where we have been able to find a number of companies that in our view have strong business models, are well-run by competent management teams and are offering an attractive combination of high dividend yields and fast growth in the underlying dividends. From a country perspective Vietnam remains the Fund's largest overweight position. While the market has lagged year-to-date, especially compared with China, the Fund's Vietnamese holdings continue to operate steadily from both a macro and bottom-up level.

Yu Zhang, CFA
Portfolio Manager
Matthews Asia



The views and information discussed in this report are as of the date of publication, are subject to change and may not reflect current views. The views expressed represent an assessment of market conditions at a specific point in time, are opinions only and should not be relied upon as investment advice regarding a particular investment or markets in general. Such information does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell specific securities or investment vehicles. Investment involves risk. Investing in international and emerging markets may involve additional risks, such as social and political instability, market illiquidity, exchange-rate fluctuations, a high level of volatility and limited regulation. Investing in small- and mid-size companies is more risky and volatile than investing in large companies as they may be more volatile and less liquid than larger companies. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The information contained herein has been derived from sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of compilation, but no representation or warranty (express or implied) is made as to the accuracy or completeness of any of this information. Matthews Asia and its affiliates do not accept any liability for losses either direct or consequential caused by the use of this information.